How we review

Our scoring is based on evidence, not opinion. We collect facts from public sources and record, for each fact, the source link, the date we read it and the evidence level.

The evidence ladder

Evidence levelFact
0No public evidence. We write "not published", which does not mean bad.
1The vendor says so (its website or documentation).
2Shown to us (a demo, a trial, screenshots we captured).
3Confirmed independently (our own hands-on test, or three or more independent user reports).

Proposed criteria and weights

These weights are our proposed method and are not final, so we show no score for now. When shown it will be an "Editorial score out of 100" with its evidence level beside it, and never a star icon that looks like a user rating.

Criterion%
Fit for the region (Arabic and RTL quality, local currencies, local payments, WhatsApp, tax or e-invoicing)25
Core features for the category25
Price clarity and value15
Setup, support and data export15
Trust signals (company age, named customers, security statement, legal entity)10
Independent user feedback (weight 0 if fewer than 10 independent reviews)10

What we record for each product

Gym and academy software

Dental clinic software

After-school and academy software

Freshness

Right of reply and corrections

What we do not do yet

Prepared by the publisher's team with AI assistance. Not yet reviewed by an independent reader.

Ownership and independence